fbpx

The Bank Scare: Mason Williams, Chief Investment Officer of Coral Gables Trust, Breaks It Down and Suggests What This Will Mean for South Florida’s Banking Landscape

Mason Williams

Why did this happen? 

At the core, imprudent and reckless government monetary, fiscal and regulatory lead to macroeconomic imbalances. Some banks, such as SVB were caught in the rapid flux between low-interest rates and high-interest environments. They had made imprudent investment decisions that matched long-term investments with short-term deposits. It is a sad and often repeated tale of government excess leading to private sector excess. Here are eight things to consider that contributed to this perfect storm:

1.  The US Government Federal Reserve maintained unprecedented monetary easing policies far too long after the financial crisis of 2008/09.

2. The US federal government engaged in massive fiscal stimulus since the COVID crisis.

3. The resulting flood of deposits into Silicon Valley Bank needed to be invested, but with interest rates so low, SVB sought to enhance yield by buying longer-term (10-year), federal treasury notes and federal mortgage-backed bonds with the idea of holding them to maturity.

4. Inflation rose dramatically in 2021/22 due to the prior points 1 and 2 above. In addition, regulatory actions by the current administration stifled domestic energy production. Rising energy prices were compounded by the war in Ukraine. The rising cost of fuel and fertilizer resulted in higher food prices so inflation became more widespread and embedded into economic expectations. This caused long term treasury and mortgage bond prices to fall.

5. SVB was unusual in that it provided specialized lending and banking services to fast-growing startups. These companies, particularly in the tech sector, often maintained large bank balances, from which they paid payroll, and other vendors.

6. As interest rates rose rapidly in 2022, the market for IPOs and startup financing slowed or dried up, resulting in more withdrawals of deposits, as companies utilized their cash on operations.

7. As deposits shrank, SVB tried to shore up their capital base by selling their long-term bonds and raising equity capital. They sold the bonds at a loss in the equity raise failed. That double loss caused speculation that the bank might be unstable, and a number of venture capital firms increase the probability of a run by recommending their portfolio companies to withdraw their deposits.

8. Beginning on Friday then over the weekend the FDIC and Federal Reserve stepped in to take over SVB and Signature Bank and expand insurance coverage for all depositors. So, the short-term crisis was averted, but the longer-term effect will be reduction of venture lending availability and reduction of the specialized banking services for startups, and a higher cost of banking services across the tech sector. Since SVB was not as well established in South Florida as in other areas of the country, our start-ups and the availability of venture debt and banking services will suffer, but not as much as in other areas of the country. However,  we have hardly any banks who would do what SVB provided to smaller, less established companies, and after SVB’s lending policies are being examined, we will have even less support for our early, growth companies providing high-paying jobs, and their support of our local economy.

Are we less likely to see rate increases from the Fed now?

The bets on what will happen at the next Federal Reserve meeting have definitely changed. A 50 basis point rate hike seems to be off the table and more likely seems to be a 25 bp hike at the next meeting. Recent CPI data that came out today would support that.  Odds of no rate hike are currently at about 20% despite the recent banking sector issues. Investors seem to believe the Federal Reserve will continue to move forward. The terminal rate expectation has moved down but as we move past the recent banking sector volatility, we could see a slight reset higher as the inflation battle takes front and center once again.

South Florida is full of regional banks and venture capital. How will our region be impacted?

The shut-down of SVB really put venture backed and earlier stage company clients at a huge disadvantage since their credit lines, as well as banking accounts, have been frozen in many cases, and thereby disabling their ability to effectively operate. These companies for the most part are not insolvent but rather have become illiquid for some time until further banking relationships have been established.

The early-stage companies in South Florida are the source of innovation and establishment of a technology center presence for South Florida. Hobbling their access to capital and liquidity for growth will hurt the image of South Florida from becoming the Silicon Valley of the East Coast and stifle the growth of our economy and high-paying jobs in our communities.

Further, the mistakes made by SVB will discourage other banks in our communities from extending credit and banking access to other early-stage companies which otherwise might becoming considered for such credit. The closure of Silicon Valley Bank (and the chilling demonstration effect for similar lenders) is likely to mean increasing difficulty for startups to raise venture debt (unsecured loans) and to enjoy the level of specialized, fast-response banking services that they had become accustomed to for more than three decades.

On July 21, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which, in part, permanently raises the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000. Do you think we might see another raise, given that deposits of more than $250,000 in these failed banks will be guaranteed?

On the question of the $250k guarantee, our thoughts are that the FDIC will revisit and discuss the current $250k limit given what has happened but probably won’t raise or eliminate it just because of this situation. The limit was raised during the 2008 financial crisis and did calm the situation down within the banking system and has been an appropriate working limit the last 14 years. The FDIC should be involved to some extent but taxpayer intervention needs to be monitored and minimized as much as possible.

You May Also Like
Amerant Bank Appoints Jesse Flowers as Palm Beach Market President

The company plans to open its third Palm Beach banking center and regional office set to open in 2025.

Read More
Amerant Bank Jesse Flowers
Amerant Bank Continues Growth With Opening of Its First Banking Center in Tampa

The Miami-based community bank also recently opened a Fort Lauderdale branch off Las Olas Boulevard.

Read More
banking center
Sheppard Morris CPAs: A Fusion of Experience and Innovation in South Florida Accounting

The firm’s services encompass tax planning and compliance, business advisory, and more.

Read More
Development Specialists, Inc. Moves Its South Florida Office to Downtown Fort Lauderdale

The national firm specializes in turnaround management and financial advisory services.

Read More
Other Posts
KENTECH Relocates Headquarters to Miami

The firm provides background investigation solutions for businesses.

Read More
KenTech
HAVN Residences & Yacht Club Unveils First Model Residence

The residence offers a look inside Palm Beach Shores’ newest luxury development.

Read More
HAVN Residences
New Construction Residence Unveiled Near Baptist Health IcePlex in Fort Lauderdale

This move-in ready property is listed by Lori Suarez and Jay Granieri with Curated Collection Group at ONE Sotheby’s International Realty.

Read More
New Construction Residence
Glamour and a Rock’n’Roll History at Andaz Hotel West Hollywood

The hotel is filled with a vibrant and rich history.

Read More
Andaz Hotel West Hollywood

Drew Limsky

Drew Limsky

Editor-in-Chief

BIOGRAPHY

Drew Limsky joined Lifestyle Media Group in August 2020 as Editor-in-Chief of South Florida Business & Wealth. His first issue of SFBW, October 2020, heralded a reimagined structure, with new content categories and a slew of fresh visual themes. “As sort of a cross between Forbes and Robb Report, with a dash of GQ and Vogue,” Limsky says, “SFBW reflects South Florida’s increasingly sophisticated and dynamic business and cultural landscape.”

Limsky, an avid traveler, swimmer and film buff who holds a law degree and Ph.D. from New York University, likes to say, “I’m a doctor, but I can’t operate—except on your brand.” He wrote his dissertation on the nonfiction work of Joan Didion. Prior to that, Limsky received his B.A. in English, summa cum laude, from Emory University and earned his M.A. in literature at American University in connection with a Masters Scholar Award fellowship.

Limsky came to SFBW at the apex of a storied career in journalism and publishing that includes six previous lead editorial roles, including for some of the world’s best-known brands. He served as global editor-in-chief of Lexus magazine, founding editor-in-chief of custom lifestyle magazines for Cadillac and Holland America Line, and was the founding editor-in-chief of Modern Luxury Interiors South Florida. He also was the executive editor for B2B magazines for Acura and Honda Financial Services, and he served as travel editor for Conde Nast. Magazines under Limsky’s editorship have garnered more than 75 industry awards.

He has also written for many of the country’s top newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, Boston Globe, USA Today, Worth, Robb Report, Afar, Time Out New York, National Geographic Traveler, Men’s Journal, Ritz-Carlton, Elite Traveler, Florida Design, Metropolis and Architectural Digest Mexico. His other clients have included Four Seasons, Acqualina Resort & Residences, Yahoo!, American Airlines, Wynn, Douglas Elliman and Corcoran. As an adjunct assistant professor, Limsky has taught journalism, film and creative writing at the City University of New York, Pace University, American University and other colleges.